lauren.rabbit Published on October 12, 2007
by lauren.rabbit

lauren.rabbit's blog

Browse posts
Merry Christmas! Happy Holiday!
Posted on December 25, 2008
2 comments (latest 2 weeks ago)
Socialization?
Posted on December 21, 2008
4 comments (latest 2 weeks ago)
Evidence- limited edition book
Posted on June 20, 2008
Technichal intro
9 comments (latest 13 months ago)

More information

This post is public
© All rights reserved
  1. Read 0 times

Technichal intro

Friday October 12, 2007 at 11:06PM

All work 100% digital free. Any effects and/or manipulations are done either in camera (occasionally) or in the darkroom (usually).
(Not that I have anything against digital, I am just a traditionalist by nature and I like to get my hands wet.)

9 Comments / add your comment?

scripernitypro says:
Lauren, there's a whole community on Apug, the resistence as it where, Analog photography users group. It's great for technical information. For instance, I'd gone out and exposed 8 rolls of 2 1/4 film at 1600 iso and remembered reading an apug post about diafine being excellent for this, usually it's d 76 or something, I happened to have the diafine on hand, enough for a gallon of dilution a and b respectively. I was able to develop 4 rolls at a time using only one two gallon can of diafine. A little tip like this saved me a couple of hours processing time. Loads of large format people there too, maybe even you? I just don't want to switch to digital, I've had to use the digital stuff semi professionally, drudgery with digital cameras has turned me off of them. I feel they can mess up your work with traditional gear. Timing and things like that get skewed.
Posted 14 months ago. ( permalink )
jayavant says:
one of my pet hates is the term "analogue" photography. there is really nothing analogue about it. the term arose only as a sort of nominal opposite to digital. it is film photography. actually i just call it photography.

like you lauren, i like getting my hands wet. i recently moved cities however - changed jobs too. the place where i used to work had a darkroom and it was mine to use. suddenly i am darkroomless and have to start one up in my new place...

i got to thinking of you. i remember loving a photo of your darkroom. you use 5x7 a lot don;t you? do you enlarge them or contact print? i have a couple of 4x5's and am thinking of shifting up to a larger format - probably 8x10 but there is something about 5x7 i rather like...

btw - i am simply in awe of your work. but you know that...
Posted 14 months ago. ( permalink )
lauren.rabbit says:
Actually nearly everything I do is 4x5. The only 5x7's are the 'home' series and my current series the devil's alphabet. Size and $$ restrict my 5x7 usage to particular series whereas 4x5 I use like a portable camera, for individual shots as well as series.
The idea of 8x10 is enticing, but last year I went to see a 8x10 Deardorff (my 4x5 is a Deardorff) and it was beautiful but just too big and the film is more than I can afford now. They're awfully pretty though and I would love 8x10 contact prints.
I'm glad you like the work.
Posted 14 months ago. ( permalink )
jayavant says:
ah - i thought those sets were 5x7. the aspect ratio is unique. so you contact print them?
Posted 14 months ago. ( permalink )
lauren.rabbit says:
Always. The detail of a contact print is just so beautiful. I recently purchased a dozen or so magnifying glasses-little ones-that I hand bead lanyards for and hang them next to the prints so when I do show people can play and look closely at details.
It serves no practical purpose, the prints are perfectly viewable as is, but it's kind of fun.
Posted 14 months ago. ( permalink )
Lodchjo (21st Century Vampire)pro says:
I love your traditionalist way of working. I recently went digital only to save time after several years of silence (job, family, other engagements). But i don't use photoshop and i avoid manipulation other than what could be done in a darkroom as well (contrast, b/w + 1 color etc.).
Anyway, didn't want to tell you my life, I just wanted to congratulate you with your outstandig work and philosophy!!
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )
lauren.rabbit replies:
If you are working digital you may as well become familiar with all photoshop can do. Besides you can get more than 1 colour in the darkroom. :)
But whatever makes you happy is how you should work. I do love darkroom so and there's never been a picture I could not make.
I appreciate your taking the time to look.
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )
Lodchjo (21st Century Vampire)pro replies:
Well, I can work with photoshop, but i simply prefer pure photography. Like you i guess.
With b&w+1 color, i meant, "photographs in b&w with just a smudge of colour". That i sometimes applied to a photo by computer, since it can also be done in the darkroom. Apart from that, only contrast, balance etc.
Have a nice weekend and succes!!
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )
lauren.rabbit replies:
Thanks and right back at 'ya.
:)
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

Add your comment

Reply to this comment

Edit your comment

Please sign in to post a comment Sign in now?


rss Latest comments – Subscribe to the feed of this post comments.