| august 2007 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sun | mon | tue | wed | thu | fri | sat | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ||
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ||
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
looking at my pics i'm wondering if it's not a too huge "mixed pixels" dish i'm serving. then i'm seeing streams of others. not all, but lots are speaking one language of their own and often in a very elaborate and fascinating way. so what's better: finding one language and sticking to it and like that become a master ( but a limitated one ) or sticking ones nose curiously in every pot trying to express yourself in different, maybe new ways ?
first way, the specialist universal : is mainly working on a limited or concentrated area ( for example only nature or humans photography, still lifes etc ) or his pics have a certain kind of atmosphere ( f.e. either romantic soft or striking colourful etc ). like that the photographer is able to deepen his knowledge and skills.
second way, the universal specialist : he's able to use a bigger variaty in order to express himself ( different topics like portraits, stills, landscape etc ) and / or different atmospheres he's using. on the other hand he normaly can't reach the depth of the specialist .
which way are you following ?
ps: i'm not talking about the genius people amongst us :)
pps: sorry i'm too lazy to translate the whole text into french and german. hope you can understand, if not you can maybe use a translation program • sorry, je suis trop paresseuse pour traduire le text en francais. j'espères que vous comprenez ou peut être utilisez un program de traduire • sorry, bin zu träge den ganzen text ins deutsche zu übersetzen. ich hoffe, ihr versteht ihn oder benutzt ein übersetzungsprogramm
Send a message
Search for members